KB article
A Lightweight Metric Dictionary That Actually Gets Used
A simple metric dictionary helps teams align without heavy governance overhead.
arf-kbsemantic-integritymeasure-inventorycanonical-metricsemantic-annotation
TL;DR
- Keep it short, in the model, and owned.
- If it’s hard to maintain, it won’t be used.
The problem
- Metric definitions are scattered across documents.
- Teams don’t trust or consult the source of truth.
Why it matters
- AI needs definitions stored in the model to retrieve them.
- A concise dictionary reduces metric sprawl.
Symptoms
- People ask “What does this mean?” repeatedly.
- New measures appear without documentation.
Root causes
- Dictionary lives outside the model.
- No ownership or review cycle.
What good looks like
- Metric dictionary stored as descriptions and annotations.
- Owners listed and review dates tracked.
How to fix
- Start with top 20 metrics.
- Add definitions to model metadata.
- Assign owners and review quarterly.
Pitfalls
- Over‑engineering the dictionary with too much detail.
- No maintenance schedule.
Checklist
- Definitions stored in model.
- Owners listed for top metrics.
- Quarterly review scheduled.
Framework placement
Primary ARF layer: Semantic Integrity. Diagnostic bridge: semantic-reliability, change-reliability.