KB article

A Lightweight Metric Dictionary That Actually Gets Used

A simple metric dictionary helps teams align without heavy governance overhead.

arf-kbsemantic-integritymeasure-inventorycanonical-metricsemantic-annotation

TL;DR

  • Keep it short, in the model, and owned.
  • If it’s hard to maintain, it won’t be used.

The problem

  • Metric definitions are scattered across documents.
  • Teams don’t trust or consult the source of truth.

Why it matters

  • AI needs definitions stored in the model to retrieve them.
  • A concise dictionary reduces metric sprawl.

Symptoms

  • People ask “What does this mean?” repeatedly.
  • New measures appear without documentation.

Root causes

  • Dictionary lives outside the model.
  • No ownership or review cycle.

What good looks like

  • Metric dictionary stored as descriptions and annotations.
  • Owners listed and review dates tracked.

How to fix

  • Start with top 20 metrics.
  • Add definitions to model metadata.
  • Assign owners and review quarterly.

Pitfalls

  • Over‑engineering the dictionary with too much detail.
  • No maintenance schedule.

Checklist

  • Definitions stored in model.
  • Owners listed for top metrics.
  • Quarterly review scheduled.

Framework placement

Primary ARF layer: Semantic Integrity. Diagnostic bridge: semantic-reliability, change-reliability.